[ad_1]
?
- Anonymous
- 2mA
Sammy: uses 200MP
Fruit for eyes: uses 12 MP
The result is not the difference between day and night, the point is that these companies want us to keep buying and buying. they just don’t want to improve on the same material.
It would be great if we had another 200MP sensor but with native RGB array and oversampling technique. Nokia / Microsoft had already shown and proven this with the PureView algorithm. Imagine how much we can achieve true lossless zoom with huge 200 MP resolution, that would be crazy!
W
- Wayne morellini
- 7 tm
Going through your article. I’m surprised that there aren’t any strictly intra-exposure HDR techniques at 16 stops mentioned. While I have come up with a number of better HDR techniques including different back-to-back exposure techniques to reduce multiple frames to red and other techniques like pixel noise reduction around 2007 (extra latitude stops clear), three exposures may result in offset smearing / brightness. tasks. Back to back can work. However, one of the methodologies I’m interested in is two years of simultaneous gain taking before Alexa, three of which would be better, and adjusting the gain as exposure (producing a better version of the multi – back to back exhibition). But, every little extra circuit gets in the way, generates heat and / or produces more noise. However, the 8kp30 limitation is a shock, it should be at least 8kp50 (close to what can be converted with the standard technique to 8kp60).
But, I’ve heard 16k, which is what the VR industry needs because 8k converts to about 2.66k on 60 degree 180 degree view, and about 1.33k on 60 degree 360 ​​degree view, below the lower end of 2k, and the two below the more optimal 4k view (than good vision can see). 16k on a phone would be good for this, although it does require USB3.1 recording to an SSD which is very acceptable, if you are going to do 16K VR / action sports recording. This is of limited value for the next generation, and even for massive still images, a reduced color filter resolution (Quad or 4×4) is not recommended. It’s not quite the next generation yet, having waited for the release of the 240mp chip for at least three to four years. Hopefully Samsung can upgrade to at least the true 8kp50 soon, which is useful for 180-degree action cameras. Being able to run with this and take 10 mile before and after photos of the run and groups of people is helpful. Something the movie guy at GoPro might be pushing for.
I5922
LG Superfan, 1 hour agoI agree if he does not have high quality digital zoom, it is useless but so far only Hu … moreWhen the image is large enough, just crop it. There is no point in increasing it again.
THE68231557
iANDROID, 2 hours agoThe only reason I would want such a massive sensor is to have lossless digital zoom. Store such m … moreI agree if it doesn’t have high quality digital zoom it is useless but so far only Huawei and Realme have been able to give high quality digital zoom, others are content to reframe and go upmarket.
D2485725
iANDROID, 1 hour agoIf the pixels are big enough, you don’t need to trillions of them and combine them. You can … moreSure. But these are smartphones, not the Hubble Telescope. Samsung or Sony are mass producing more of these phone sensors in an hour than people buy full-size cameras in a decade. So something must give, which is obviously the average quality. The way to consistently solve this problem is to find simple solutions like math. We’ve been doing the same thing on computers for decades. If you have excessive graphics power, you can enable supersampling which works on the same principle to hide rendering issues by rendering four times as many pixels as you can see on your screen.
I5922
Duck of death, 1 hour agoIt is not for zooming. It wouldn’t be a good use for it. It is to repair the com … moreIf the pixels are big enough, you don’t need to trillions of them and combine them. You only have these “bits” without needing to combine them.
F7031
I don’t believe this video explains that pixels cannot change color perception on demand. But I appreciate that the sensors are getting bigger.
D2485725
iANDROID, 2 hours agoThe only reason I would want such a massive sensor is to have lossless digital zoom. Store such m … moreIt is not for zooming. It wouldn’t be a good use for it. This is to solve common subpixel issues that we encounter on smartphones. These issues are very easy to spot if you do a side-by-side comparison with a large DSLR type camera. Before binning, phones used all kinds of “AI” (read, guess) to fix quality issues on these miniaturized cameras. With binning, he can use math to find the most likely exposure level for each pixel in your photo.
3466764Quad 200mp with correct processing is bound to look good. 8K should be sharper with enough pixels unlike current quad / nona sensors, as opposed to 40mp with standard bayer.
I5922
The only reason I would want such a massive sensor is to have lossless digital zoom. Storing such massive images is a waste of storage space and is only useful in the very rare cases where you need to crop (digitally zoom) things again later.
Even for the pixel combination, I don’t think it makes much sense. The zoom part is pretty neat though.
13298If it’s going to be Xiaomi CIVI (old CC) with snapdragon 778/780 then it’s sensor waste
if they use SD 888+ we will probably see a nice photo
NOT
- NasserSalomon
- Qra
I still prefer the GN2 because of the larger size of the pixels and the sensor
[ad_2]
